What is SCA (Strong Customer Authentication)?

SCA stands for Strong Customer Authentication and it’s a European regulation that makes customers verify who they are when they make electronic payments. PSD2 laws created this requirement. This extra security step has become one of merchants’ best tools for preventing fraud-related chargebacks.

This matters quite a bit for your business. It gets much harder for customers to claim they never authorized a transaction when they have to verify their identity through two or more authentication checks. If a person has to enter their password and then confirm it with their fingerprint or a text message code, they can’t just say “that wasn’t me” later on.

Europe has seen pretty impressive results. Before SCA rolled out, unauthorized transaction claims were one of the biggest problems for merchants. Unauthorized transaction claims have dropped quite a bit since customers now have to complete more verification steps to finish their purchases. It’s much harder to dispute a charge when the bank can show that you entered your PIN and approved the transaction on your phone.

This extra layer of protection works for everyone. Customers feel safer because fraudsters can’t just steal their card number and make unauthorized purchases. At the same time merchants get better protection against actual fraud and false claims of fraud. Banks now have an authentication trail that creates evidence the right person made the payment.

How It Works

Strong Customer Authentication works by checking three different types of proof before it lets a customer finish a payment. Businesses use three separate categories because each one catches fraudsters who already have some customer information.

Something your customer actually knows in their head makes up the first type of proof – like a password they’ve memorized or a PIN that they enter into the ATM. Payment providers sometimes add security questions on top of this, asking about personal bits of info which only live in that person’s memory. Hackers can’t just grab information locked away in someone’s brain and that’s the whole point behind this category.

How It Works

Something your customer physically owns and carries around with them forms the second type of proof – this could be their smartphone that receives a text message with a one-time code or maybe a banking app which generates fresh numbers every few minutes. Some banks mail out little card readers or token devices that customers have to use when they check out. This physical device has to be in their hands when they want to buy something.

Biometric data provides the third type of proof – we’re talking about what your customer physically is. Smartphones have made this pretty popular since customers can just touch their finger to the screen or look at their camera to approve a payment. Voice recognition shows up more and more too. These physical characteristics are ones which belong to just one person and they’re almost impossible for criminals to copy or steal.

Most payment systems will ask customers for two of these three types of proof. Your customer might type in their password and then scan their fingerprint on their phone to finish the transaction or they’ll enter their PIN and wait for a text message code to arrive. I see this double-checking setup everywhere because it creates multiple layers of protection which all work separately from one another.

How it Affects Chargeback Prevention

SCA actually helps merchants fight chargebacks in ways that might shock you. Customers going through the verification process with multiple authentication methods create an easy-to-follow paper trail that merchants can use later when disputes come up.

Merchants lie awake at night worrying about those dreaded “I didn’t make this purchase” chargebacks. With SCA in place, customers have to authenticate themselves before completing any transaction and it makes it much harder for them to later claim the purchase wasn’t authorized. All the evidence is right there in the authentication records.

How it Affects Chargeback Prevention.jpg 13-28-07-622

European laws take this protection one step further. Merchants who follow SCA laws see the liability for a lot of types of fraud move away from them and it means that they’ll face fewer losses from fraudulent transactions and much better protection for their business as a whole.

Merchants see fairly strong results. Merchants who use SCA correctly usually see their chargeback ratios drop quite a bit. Friendly fraud gets much less common because customers know that the authentication process leaves a trail behind. Disputes that do happen give merchants way stronger evidence to defend themselves with.

Some businesses report that their unauthorized transaction disputes drop by half or more after they start the right authentication. Others find that their dispute rates improve enough to qualify for better payment processor rates and terms. These improvements translate directly into saved money and far fewer issues for the merchant.

Example Scenarios

A few weeks later that same customer tries to dispute the charge and you have some proof that they actually authorized the transaction. Any dispute is much easier for you to win as the merchant since the bank can instantly see they completed the authentication process.

Example Scenarios

Of course not every transaction actually needs that full authentication process. Subscription service customers who pay you $9.99 every month like clockwork. After their very first payment goes through with the full authentication, those recurring charges usually skip the extra verification steps. Your payment processor recognizes the established pattern and applies the exemption automatically. Your customer gets a smooth, frictionless experience while you still get some protection against possible disputes.

Different businesses see different authentication patterns as well. Software businesses may have to run authentication for the first buy but then allow add-ons or upgrades to process without any extra verification steps. Online retailers might need authentication for orders above a dollar amount but let smaller purchases flow through without any friction. You want to balance convenience for your business model and make sure the authentication trail stays ready whenever disputes come up.

Requirements and Timeframes

Strong Customer Authentication (SCA) laws apply to any business that processes payments from customers in Europe – that’s all EU countries and Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein. Most merchants don’t realize that it doesn’t matter where your business is actually located – if your customer’s bank is in one of these countries, you need to follow SCA laws.

Most payment transactions do need SCA compliance. A handful of exceptions can make the process easier. Any transaction under 30 euros skips the extra verification steps altogether. Subscription payments work a bit differently – SCA only applies to the very first charge when a customer signs up and every recurring payment after that can skip the extra verification. Low-risk transactions under 500 euros might also qualify for an exemption and your fraud rates will decide if you’re eligible. Your payment processor will take care of these exemption decisions automatically, so you won’t have to review each transaction yourself.

Requirements and Timeframes

Each European country rolled out its SCA laws at a different pace and this enforcement timeline created a lot of issues for merchants. Britain was slower and didn’t finish full enforcement until March 2022 but France and Italy wrapped up their transition periods around that same window. To make matters even more confusing, some countries were extremely strict from day one but others were more lenient and gave merchants much longer grace periods to update their payment systems.

SCA law violations give you financial problems and I see merchants underestimate how fast these problems can add up. Banks automatically decline transactions that should have SCA authentication but don’t have it. That means you lose sales instantly. Even worse, you also lose all chargeback protection on payments that skip the SCA steps. If a customer disputes one of these charges then you’ll automatically lose the case no matter what happened. Card networks can also impose fines for repeated SCA violations and these penalties will increase faster if you don’t fix the compliance gaps.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does SCA cut back on friendly fraud chargebacks?

A customer claims that they never made that order and you need firm proof that they actually did make it. Multi-factor authentication can become your strongest defense in these situations. Every time a shopper completes those extra security steps, you get an online paper trail - one that shows the very second they entered their password and confirmed their identity from their own device.

Customers find it hard to dispute transactions later after typing in that verification code from their own phone. Authentication leaves this online trail that proves they had control of their device and their account at that exact second. Banks and credit card businesses really care about this verification data during their fraud investigations and usually treat it as strong proof that the person was actually behind the transaction.

False dispute rates drop by as much as 70 percent (this large drop happens because the customers can't just claim ignorance anymore and have to actively join the entire buying process).

This protection matters more than most merchants think. Every successful dispute costs you the original sale amount and the extra fees on top of that. Sometimes you even lose the physical product if you have already shipped it out. Having that authentication record to show the card company puts you in a much stronger position. Customers now have to explain how anyone could have gotten hold of their card and their personal phone at the same time. In most cases they just can't come up with an explanation because they actually placed the order themselves.

What happens without SCA compliance?

If your business works with credit card payments from European customers, costs can escalate fast once your setup doesn't follow the compliance laws. Ignore the laws and the first consequence is you lose all chargeback protection on each transaction. Any customer dispute automatically goes in their favor whenever they challenge a charge. They pull the money right out of your business account.

European banks actually have the ability to refuse your transactions altogether and make everything worse. A customer comes along ready to buy with a credit card in hand and the payment gets rejected. Not because there's anything wrong with their account or they don't have enough funds - just because your payment setup doesn't meet the compliance standards. That possible revenue just walks right out the door.

That liability change is probably the most painful part and I see businesses get taken aback by this all the time. Card networks give merchants protection against different types of fraud most of the time. Your business becomes responsible for fraudulent transactions once compliance breaks down and that protection disappears completely. Just one instance of fraud can run into thousands of dollars.

Businesses assume that they can wait and see how the situation develops, maybe hoping they'll stay unnoticed for a while. Regulatory fines start instantly once the authorities find non-compliance - that's what makes this risky. There are no warnings or grace periods to get everything fixed. Penalty notices just arrive in your mailbox demanding payment. At the same time, chargeback losses keep adding up day after day. Your cash flow can get devastated in a matter of weeks from regulatory fines and lost dispute cases combined.

Are chargebacks still possible after SCA?

Some think that the SCA completely removes chargebacks. It doesn't work that way though. Customers can still dispute charges if they never receive their product or if what arrives is broken or definitely wrong and those situations remain reasons to ask the bank for your money back.

Unauthorized-transaction claims have changed quite a bit - this used to be an almost automatic win for customers. SCA authentication leaves an online paper trail which is very hard to dispute. Banks can see that the actual cardholder approved the order. That evidence makes it nearly impossible to claim that somebody else used your card without permission.

Before the SCA came along, merchants had to take customers at their word about unauthorized charges. Merchants now have solid proof that the right person placed the order. That tips the balance heavily in favor of merchants during disputes.

This protection isn't absolute. It's much stronger than what merchants had before though. They still need to deliver what they promise and to manage customer service well. Yet they no longer have to worry nearly as much about buyers who claim fraud after remorse sets in. Authentication records now work like a shield in these disputes.

How much does SCA typically affect conversion rates?

Look at the big picture here - these authentication laws put businesses in a tough position between protecting themselves and keeping customers happy during checkout. Most authenticated transactions convert around 82% across Europe but it changes quite a bit - some harder markets see about 75% while regions where customers are used to the process can hit nearly 90%. Markets without authentication laws still come in at 7-13% higher. This temporary friction has to be weighed against the long-term protection from fewer chargebacks and fraud losses.

A smart rollout makes this transition work instead of turning everything on everywhere at once. Exemptions can be helpful if they're done right - transaction danger-analysis tools let you skip extra authentication steps for deals that don't actually need them. Picking authentication methods that customers find easy to use keeps the whole experience smooth. Merchants were worried about what this might do to their conversion rates. Most have found that when they change their strategy and give shoppers a little time to get comfortable with the changes they can capture the security they want and conversion numbers they can live with.

Chargeback disputes are already a headache on their own and layering new authentication laws on top of them makes the situation tougher. Businesses wind up with two separate problems that need attention at the same time. Fraud-prevention routines that businesses already know now have to work alongside these brand-new laws and most businesses just aren't equipped to manage both at once. Each area has its own set of regulations and best practices and once they start to overlap it creates some pretty complex situations that need an expert who understands both sides to sort them out.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *