NA: Non-Receipt of Cash from ATM
NA disputes happen after a cardholder files a complaint with Discover because their account got charged, but the ATM never actually gave them their cash. It’s a frustrating situation where the customer walks away empty-handed, and their bank account shows that the withdrawal went through anyway.
For merchants who run ATMs or process these transactions, NA disputes can become a problem very fast. You need to know how to manage them because each one represents lost revenue until you can prove that the cash is actually dispensed correctly. The evidence you get together and how fast you respond will determine if you hold onto that money or lose it to the dispute.
Discover NA code works differently from other card networks. They have their own set of rules for what evidence actually counts and how fast you need to submit it. Miss their deadline or send the wrong documents, and you automatically lose the dispute – that’s money you lose directly.
Most merchants miss how much these disputes add up over time. A few hundred dollars here and there might not seem like much. But if you multiply that across multiple ATMs and a few disputes per month, the revenue loss adds up to quite a bit. The best strategy is to know what Discover wants to see as proof and have systems already in place to capture that information before disputes even happen.
How It Works
Most cardholders have no idea what they’re walking into when they call Discover to report an ATM that kept their money without giving them any cash back. It’s pretty frustrating – you enter your PIN, ask for your cash, and then nothing comes out even though your balance goes down. Cardholders usually call Discover within a day or 2 to complain, and this starts with reason code NF and begins the whole dispute process.
Discover acts faster once it gets a complaint like this. They’ll get all the transaction info immediately and check if the ATM authorization actually went through on their end. The system automatically scans for any warning signs that might explain the problem – issues like a few withdrawal attempts in a row or other unusual activity around that same time. The merchant who runs that ATM gets an official dispute notice sent straight through the payment processor.
Merchants who operate ATMs don’t have much time. You have roughly 10 days to respond with evidence that the cash came out. The best strategy is to get the ATM’s electronic journal – this record lists every last transaction down to the second. Security camera footage can be helpful evidence if you have it. The ATM’s cash cassette records are also helpful because they can show if the right amount of money was actually left in the machine during that exact transaction.
Discover looks at all the evidence that each side sends in and makes its final choice on who’s responsible for the missing cash. They’ll check if the ATM balanced correctly at the end of that business day and if any other customers reported similar problems around that same time. The whole process usually takes 45 to 60 days, though harder cases can take longer.
How it Affects Chargeback Prevention
When an ATM fails to dispense cash but still charges a customer’s account, that’s when merchants run into big problems. These disputes pile up quickly without the right systems in place to stop them from happening in the first place.
The best defense starts with complete ATM logs that prove what happened during each transaction. Track the exact time, the amount the customer requested, and whether the cash was successfully dispensed. Surveillance cameras are just as important in this process. Make sure they capture the cash-dispensing area well and store those recordings for at least 90 days.
Regular maintenance directly protects your bottom line. A machine that jams frequently or miscounts bills will generate disputes that cost money in fees and damage your chargeback ratio over time. The strategy is to schedule maintenance checks before problems start showing up instead of waiting for customer complaints to roll in.
Each chargeback can cost between $20 and $100 in fees alone. But that’s not even the worst part. The true damage happens once your chargeback ratio climbs above the acceptable thresholds that payment processors monitor. These providers watch chargeback numbers very closely and may increase fees or terminate merchant accounts if the ratio gets too high.
ATM performance data can show troublesome patterns before they turn into expensive problems that hurt your business. Watch for particular machines or time periods that generate more disputes than others. Maybe one ATM needs some replacement parts, or maybe weekend maintenance checks would catch problems before they affect customers and cost money.
Example Scenarios
Sometimes an ATM just decides it doesn’t want to cooperate anymore, and customers will finish their entire transaction but walk away empty-handed. The first customer might think they did something wrong or maybe hit the wrong buttons. When the second and third customers come to you with the exact same problem, you know there’s a mechanical issue that needs attention right away.
Speed is everything in this situation. You should shut down that ATM immediately and get your service provider on the phone. Write down each complaint along with the exact time and the amount each customer tried to withdraw.
A very different situation that actually happens all the time deals with chargebacks from customers who claim they never received their money. Let’s say a customer files a chargeback for $300 that they insist never came out of your ATM last Tuesday. You pull up the camera footage from that day, and there they are, plain as day, right in front of the machine. Watch them count the bills not once but twice before they fold them up and stick them in their wallet. The ATM transaction journal shows that the cash came out without any problems, and the cassette balance matches what should be there.
All the records and security cameras pay for themselves in moments like these. You send the video footage and the ATM transaction log to challenge the chargeback, and most banks will side with the business owner when the evidence is this obvious. Just make sure that the cameras are working and recording like they should before anything goes wrong.
Requirements and Timeframes
A customer files a dispute about not receiving cash from your ATM, and timing deadlines matter. Cardholders get 120 days from the exact transaction date to report the problem to Discover. But if they submit a retrieval form first, they get an extra 30 days on top of the original window.
Once Discover sends a notification about a dispute, there’s usually just 10 business days to file your response. Miss that deadline and the dispute is lost automatically, and you’ll pay for the money – it doesn’t matter if the claim turns out to be valid or completely bogus.
Discover expects strong evidence for fighting these disputes. Transaction logs from your ATM are the most basic requirement that they want to see. They also expect surveillance footage if cameras are installed around the machine. You need to show proof that the machine actually dispensed the cash as intended or that a refund was already processed for that particular customer.
ATM record retention is an area where you want to be extra careful. Keep your transaction records for at least 18 months if you want to stay completely protected. Video footage works a bit differently, though – it needs to stay in your system for a minimum of 90 days, and even that’s barely enough. I see merchants all the time who believe that 30 days will be enough for their needs. But that timeframe barely covers the first dispute window that customers have available. These records need to stay accessible and ready to pull up in case you might need them later.
Recent Discover updates have made the evidence laws stricter than they were before. They now want much clearer timestamps on the records. The surveillance footage needs to be wide enough so it shows the ATM screen and the cash dispensing area whenever possible.
Frequently Asked Questions
How can merchants protect themselves from fraudulent ATM non-receipt claims?
The most important step is to make sure that your ATM clock and security camera timestamps line up. Even a small 5-minute gap can make it almost impossible to prove what happened during a disputed transaction.
Keep records each time you service the machine and write down how much cash you put in the cassettes during refills. These service logs become your best defense if a customer makes a dispute weeks or months later.
Plain warning signs can stop a problem before it starts. Post visible notices that tell customers the ATM records all transactions and surveillance cameras watch the area. Customers who see these notices are less likely to make false claims.
Watch for patterns in the disputes that you receive. If the same ATM location gets multiple complaints every Friday night, something may be wrong with that particular machine. Or it could just be repeat scammers who think they've found a soft target.
Your cash counts need to match your transaction reports each day. When the numbers line up to the penny, you can respond to any dispute with confidence. Banks and card networks take these reconciliation reports very seriously because they show that you're running a tight operation that tracks every dollar that goes in and out.
What evidence is most when disputing an NA/NF chargeback?
The electronic journal logs are going to be your most reliable evidence here. These complete records can tell you everything you need to know about what actually happened during that exact transaction. The logs will show you if the ATM released the cash or if there was a malfunction that kept it from working. Once you can show that the logs confirm a successful cash release, then you'll have proof to support your case with the bank.
Video footage ranks as your 2nd-best option for defending against these disputes. Any video that shows the customer taking the cash from your ATM makes your case nearly impossible to dispute. Just make sure the footage is sharp enough that you can see what happened at the machine.
Your day-to-day cash balance reports matter quite a bit too. If your ATM balanced correctly at the end of the day, it gets much harder for anyone to argue that the money actually went missing. These reports prove that every dollar the machine was supposed to have is still sitting right where it should be.
Your maintenance records are actually a big deal. Customer disputes can get messy and if anyone tries to claim that the machine malfunctioned during their transaction, your maintenance records become your best defense.
1 important detail ties everything together. Any evidence that you collect needs timestamps that match up with the disputed transaction. Without those matching timestamps - even quality video footage won't carry much weight in your favor. Make sure that everything you submit links back to that exact transaction, or the bank won't treat it as relevant to the dispute.
What is the typical investigation timeline for ATM non-receipt disputes?
Once a cardholder files a dispute saying they didn't get cash from an ATM, Discover will usually reach out within 5 to 7 business days. That message is your starting gun and the clock starts the instant it hits your desk.
You'll get roughly 10 days to pull together the evidence and send it back to them once that message arrives. But don't wait until day 9 to start collecting your paperwork. Discover needs enough time to review the materials that you submit and their review process usually takes another couple of weeks on its own.
The timeline can stretch well past what you might expect. Discover may ask for extra documents or need to work directly with the ATM network operator. Either of these situations tacks on a few more weeks to an already long process. Multi-party investigations can get messy fast when everyone has to share sensitive transaction data and line up their findings.
Most merchants don't expect this part of the process. The cardholder gets provisional credit immediately - and usually as you're still scrambling to get together your paperwork. The final call can take anywhere from 45 to 90 days to land - it's a long time to wait.
Technical problems can slow the whole investigation to a crawl. ATM disputes need paperwork - transaction logs, security camera footage, cash balance sheets and network messages all have to be checked and cross-referenced. Every piece of evidence has to be confirmed and wrapping it all up takes time.
Can merchants be held liable for third-party ATM network failures?
Yes. The 2025 PCI TR-31 mandate put pressure on ATM owners and every machine that you own had to be upgraded with security procedures before January 1, 2025. Without these upgrades, payment processors may be declining transactions altogether and the operational failures and their related costs will fall directly onto the machine owner's shoulders. That could cause disruptions to your operations.
Records and reliable service agreements have become the main tools for protecting your business interests. Merchants are already keeping complete records of the network connectivity problems and system errors that happen completely outside of their direct control - this paper trail can become the main factor for moving the liability away from your business during payment disputes and regulatory investigations.
As we look ahead, you'll need to keep up with these changing compliance laws and liability problems. It's going to need the right combination of technical support and regulatory knowledge so you can get through the tougher payment processing laws.
Leave a Reply