Call (844) NO-DISPUTESWhat is The Excessive Chargeback Program?
Mastercard uses the Excessive Chargeback Program to monitor merchants with high dispute rates. If too many customers are disputing charges, they’re watching – and they’re not happy about it.
The tracking programs and their fines caught my attention when first encountering them. They start merchants off at $500 a month. But these penalties can climb to $25,000 for merchants who couldn’t get their disputes under control. Some businesses actually lost their ability to accept credit cards altogether. A processor might just cut ties because the liability has become too high for them. And if a business can’t process cards, that’s a death sentence for most companies today. Even if the processor sticks around, they’re going to make merchants pay for it – rates jumping up by half a percent or even a full percent, and they’ll want monthly reports that demonstrate how issues are being resolved.
The reason the card networks care this much is money, naturally. Each chargeback burns through $25 to $40 of the issuing bank’s money just in operational costs – and that’s before we even talk about refunding the transaction itself. So when a business starts racking up disputes because of billing errors, customers who can’t reach support, or straight-up fraud, everyone else in the payment chain ends up footing the bill through higher fees.
Visa has something similar called the Dispute Watching Program. They get concerned at 0.9% with at least 100 chargebacks, and Mastercard draws their line at 1% with that same 100-chargeback floor. So if you’re running 10,000 transactions a month and 100 customers file disputes, you’ve hit that 1% mark. Once you cross over, you have maybe a month or two before they officially enroll you. Escape requires patience – most merchants need three to six months of staying below the threshold before they’re released, and yes, you’re still paying those fines every month while you work your way out.
How It Works
Your processor runs these calculations monthly – they take this month’s chargebacks and divide them by last month’s total sales. So if a business gets hit with 50 chargebacks in October but processed 4,000 transactions back in September, they’re looking at a 1.25% ratio. Could be worse. But it’s definitely worth monitoring.
The math itself isn’t hard. Where it gets tricky is when merchants try to understand what those percentages actually mean for their business. From what I’ve experienced, if you hit the two triggers (100 chargebacks and that 1% ratio in the same month) you’re automatically enrolled in their compliance program. One merchant friend went from stable to buried in extra fees after just two rough months. The card networks don’t mess around with enforcement.
Something most merchants don’t catch right away – processors calculate with a one-month delay for sales. They compare October’s chargebacks to September’s sales because disputes need time to show up. Makes sense if we think about it – customers usually don’t even see the charge until their statement comes weeks later. So if September was slow for you, those October chargebacks might push your ratio way up.
These programs work in tiers, and each tier gets more expensive. You might see warning flags around 0.75%, then enforcement kicks in at 1%. Once you’re past 1.5%, expect bigger fees and representatives checking in frequently. Some processors tack on $25-100 per chargeback after you’re in the program – and that’s before the chargeback cost. Different networks have their own limits. But they’re all in roughly the same ballpark.
You’ll know within a week if you’ve crossed into dangerous territory. Your processor sends out notifications showing your ratio, how long you’ve been flagged, and what comes next. Sometimes first-timers get a month to fix the situation, sometimes they don’t. Some businesses lose their ability to process cards completely.
How it Affects Chargeback Prevention
Once you’re enrolled, card networks start pushing for stronger fraud controls and better customer service processes. They make you build all the systems you should have set up earlier.
I work with lots of merchants who obsess over their chargeback ratios as they work to stay below ECP thresholds, and what they discover is their whole dispute process is somewhat broken. Just to track percentages isn’t enough anymore. You actually need prevention systems – maybe extra verification when customers order expensive items, automated messages if a shipment gets delayed, systems that update inventory so you don’t accidentally sell products you don’t have. Merchants who put these controls in place usually see their ratios drop by about a third within a few months.
The monthly fines are one issue – could be anywhere from $5,000 to $25,000 based on your processing volume. But if you’re stuck in the program for more than 6 months, your processor might just shut you down. Banks start seeing you differently with excessive chargebacks. And once you get that high-risk label, the search for a new processor turns into this whole expensive mess. Rates can jump from around 2.5% to over 4%, and then they want reserves held on top of that.
Merchants who get hit with ECP laws usually run better businesses afterward – their customer service gets sharper, product descriptions become more precise, and shipping updates go out faster. The ones who actually make these improvements seem to have smoother operations with predictable cash flow.
Example Scenarios
Subscription businesses face the chargeback issue more than you’d expect. There was an online fitness platform that was doing fine – they processed about 10,000 transactions monthly with maybe 40 chargebacks. Nothing alarming. Then their billing team updated how charges showed up on statements, and suddenly members were disputing instead of reaching out to support. Two months later, they had 120 chargebacks and found themselves over that 1.2% line, straight into ECP territory.
Your processor watches these ratios like a hawk and calculates everything down to the decimal each month. What bothers me is how fast it happens. You go over 1% for just two consecutive months and you’re enrolled. No discussion, no heads-up – just a letter telling you about the higher fees and new restrictions.
Something similar can happen with clothing boutiques during the holidays. November stays normal – 5,000 transactions, maybe 20-30 chargebacks, and sits comfortably at 0.5%. But December brings 8,000 transactions and 95 chargebacks. Gift recipients don’t know the charges, buyers have second thoughts after shopping sprees. They hit 1.2%, and when January returns roll in, it gets worse. By February, they’re stuck in the program.
That’s where it gets painful. You need six consecutive months under the threshold. Meanwhile you’re paying hundreds more per chargeback, along with monitoring fees. And the money isn’t even the worst part. Processors get nervous about you. Some start holding reserves – they freeze chunks of your revenue. Others just drop you altogether. They protect their own compliance status, and your business ends up as collateral damage.
Requirements and Timeframes
The bank will ask for monthly reports once they put a merchant in their review program. From what we’ve seen in the industry, they want to see root cause analysis, how the merchant plans to stop future disputes, and concrete steps being taken to bring those numbers down. If even one report gets missed, it can be devastating – I watched a client lose their entire processing capability because they forgot to submit their February update.
The timing is fairly predictable. The first warning comes around 1% dispute ratio or 100 disputes in a month – whichever happens first. If the numbers don’t improve, they’ll officially enroll the merchant. Some processors give an extra month or two before enrollment kicks in. But merchants shouldn’t bet on that cushion.
The financial hit comes fast. The first month might mean 5-10% more in processing fees. Though to be honest, plenty of processors just cut merchants off completely. Those percentages show how much threat they think the business poses to their network.
Even after graduation, they watch for another six to twelve months. Three quarters of the time, it’s right back in the program. Only this time, everything takes longer to resolve and those fee increases usually stay permanently.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the current Mastercard ECP thresholds?
I've worked with merchants who get caught off guard by these programs, and the guidelines keep changing on us. Businesses hit their radar once they reach about 1% of their transactions as chargebacks (that's the 100 basis points they talk about) but they also need a particular number of chargebacks each month. It usually hovers around 100 for most businesses.
What makes this tricky is that business type and location matter. One client in the high-exposure space got pulled into the program at just 75 chargebacks. But then an established retailer didn't see any problems until they hit 150. They switched up their laws twice just last year, so what worked for clients in 2022 didn't necessarily help them in 2023.
To exit takes patience - businesses need three clean months below their limits. One merchant thought they were almost free. But they went over in their second month and had to start the whole process again. Some processors want you to jump through extra hoops too. They'll ask for beefed-up fraud tools or make sure refund policies show up everywhere on the site before they'll release you.
Every processor seems to read the card network laws their own way. Your agreement should spell out the exact numbers. But honestly - most merchants signed those documents years ago and the important info is buried somewhere deep in the fine print. Call your rep and ask them straight-up what the limits are for your particular business type and volume. Better to know now than find out after you're already enrolled.
What happens if my business can't exit the ECP?
I've watched chargeback programs spiral out of control more times than anyone would care to admit. What starts as a manageable $300 monthly fine can turn into $5,000 before anyone knows it - this actually happened with a client in just under six months. Your processor won't continue hiking these fees indefinitely. At some point, they'll pull the plug on your merchant account completely.
When they do terminate you for chargebacks, you'll probably land on the MATCH list - that's the Member Alert to Control High-Risk database. Merchants should think of it as a five-year scarlet letter for payment processing. Once you're on there, another processor becomes nearly impossible to secure. Merchants have come in after being turned down by a dozen processors, all because of that MATCH flag.
Sometimes processors try to protect themselves before termination by creating rolling reserves. They'll hold onto 5-10% of your sales and we're talking about holding it for months - sometimes 180 days. One retailer had $50,000 tied up this way. When you're already bleeding money from chargebacks and fines and 10% of revenue is locked away for half a year, that's usually the final nail.
Based on industry patterns, merchants can go from receiving a warning letter to having their accounts shut down in about 90 days if the numbers stay bad. Payment facilitators like Stripe usually move faster than traditional processors. But they're all playing by the same rulebook. Visa wants merchants under 1% chargeback ratio, Mastercard gives them until 1.5%. Once those lines are crossed, processors have to take action - if they don't, the card networks come after them.
Do other card networks have similar programs to Mastercard's ECP?
After working with these chargeback programs for years, each card network has their own strategy with completely different laws. Take Visa's program - VDMP kicks in once you hit 0.9% chargeback ratio. That's 100 chargebacks for every 11,111 transactions. They give you more breathing room at 1.5%. But they calculate everything differently. And American Express and Discover keep their exact thresholds quiet, though they watch.
What catches merchants off guard is landing in multiple programs simultaneously. You'll see businesses that were fine with Mastercard's threshold but got flagged by Visa anyway. Because Visa looks at this month's chargebacks against this month's sales. But Mastercard compares this month's chargebacks to last month's sales. That one-month difference throws everything off and can push you over their limits even when your performance hasn't changed.
The fees start stacking up pretty fast too. With Visa's standard program at that 0.9% level, you're looking at $50 per chargeback after your first month in the program. Hit their excessive tier at 1.8%, and that jumps to $100 per chargeback. Mastercard starts you off with $1,000 monthly review fees and those just climb from there. Then your payment processor piles on their own penalties - so you're paying multiple parties while trying to fix the same problem.
From my experience, merchants who stay ahead of this track each network's metrics individually. They check their ratios every day instead of waiting for month-end reports. They spot issues coming weeks before the card networks send their first warning letter.
Leave a Reply